England vs Panama: Harry Kane hits hat-trick as Three Lions send World Cup records tumbling

Never in English football history has a task built up to be so difficult been so easy. England cut Panama into pieces here in Nizhny Novgorod, winning 6-1, 5-0 up at half-time, their biggest ever World Cup win and the most one-sided game too.

They are through to the last-16, with two wins out of two, although this was as different from Monday night in Volgograd, the tension and late explosion, as you could imagine. But the two wins together mean that England are now level with Belgium, even on goal difference, heading into Thursday’s Kaliningrad showdown.

Will this go down as one of the great England performances, the Holland 1996 for the next generation? Of course not. This was the worst opposition they have faced at a World Cup for decades. But the uniqueness of the afternoon, seeing England cut loose like this, still attacking, still scoring, even when the game was dead, did stand out. This was a long way from what we are used to, that anxious narrow one-goal scrape with a nervous retreat in the second half.

And it was even further from the game so many of us had prepared ourselves for. There were days of earnest, respectful build-up about what a hard ugly slog this game would be. Steve Holland intoned in Repino that Panama were “well organised, athletic and clever”, and the whole football nation was getting ready for an afternoon of frustration, another patience-test.

But this was one of those rare occasions where English football overestimated the strength of the opposition. Because this Panama side was dismal. They came onto the field with only one plan, which was to foul. But that only made things worse, as they conceded two first-half penalties, both scored by Harry Kane, and another from a corner when their defenders were more interested in wrestling than in marking.

The game was more one-sided than you would ever want to see at a major tournament, and so felt wildly at odds with what we have seen in Russia so far. Remember that it took Belgium until the start of the second half to score past Panama. It took Brazil 91 minutes to score past Costa Rica. Here, England were 5-0 up at half-time.

The ease of the win also confounded worries that it would be impossible for England to attack down here in this greenhouse of a stadium in the basin of the Volga. With temperatures in the 30s, and the sun shining through plastic panels onto the pitch, it felt like another reason why this would be so hard. But in truth it was the dirty aggression of the Panama players – Jesse Lingard laid out from a first-minute elbow – that was the biggest threat to England’s rhythm at the start.

But violence is meant to be means, not an end in itself. When Kieran Trippier stood over a corner from the right, eight minutes in, the Panama defenders were desperate to straight-jacket Harry Maguire, Jordan Henderson and Harry Kane. So desperate that they lost sight of the whole point of marking, and lost sight of the other man. John Stones looked like the only man without a dance partner, but he was free to head in.

England

@England

Fair play, Panama! Our opponents celebrate as they pull a goal back through Felipe Baloy on 78 minutes.

It’s now 6-1 to the . pic.twitter.com/3HpJah0gbm

England

@England

What a win for the – and we’re through to the knockout stage with a game to spare! 👍 pic.twitter.com/4gv7HdfJh1

View image on Twitter

It briefly felt as if England now needed to score a second, to take advantage of being on top, to pull away from their opponent in a way that they never managed against Tunisia. But there was never any real tension to it, because once England were ahead, the Panamanian defence collapsed. Every time England attacked they looked like scoring, and when it came, the second goal was even easier than the first.

Trippier chipped a ball over the top to Jesse Lingard, who was of course bundled over by Fidel Escobar and Roman Torres, Panama’s hapless centre-halves. Harry Kane put the penalty into the top left corner.

This was the moment England had been waiting for, their first two-goal first-half lead in a World Cup game since 2002. And with that, all that freedom and energy that Southgate promised came flooding into England’s play. England were still waiting for their first open-play goal of the World Cup but that came next as Jesse Lingard cut in from the left, passed to Sterling, received the return and bent a shot from 20 yards into the far top corner of the net.

Better opponents might have got through to half-time at 3-0 and re-grouped from there. Panama found time to conceded two more. England’s fourth was from an inventive set-piece move, Trippier to Henderson to Kane to Sterling, whose shot was saved, but Stones’ header was not. Again, the lack of marking from a team which is meant to be nothing if not defensively disciplined was remarkable.

And then, if any final proof was needed that mistakes were going ignored and repeated, the fifth goal. Another corner, Kane again in a bear-hug from Anibal Godoy, and a clear penalty decision. It felt absurd for a team in this position to be handing out gifts like this, but Kane is not a man to say no out of politeness. The penalty went the same way as his last one.

England's Harry Kane celebrates scoring their second goal© REUTERS/Carlos Barria England’s Harry Kane celebrates scoring their second goal

The second half was a non-event, of course, but there was time for Kane to complete his hat-trick. And even he did not look too enthused by how it game about. Ruben Loftus-Cheek let off a shot from 25 yards out, it clipped Kane on the back of a heel and deflected past Jaime Penedo and into the net. But that was his third, England’s sixth, and Kane’s fifth of what is already a brilliant World Cup for him. He jogged straight off to be replaced by Jamie Vardy.

Panama did rally, in a sense, and substitute Felipe Baloy scored a late consolation goal from a free-kick to end the game 6-1. Leaving England matched with Belgium on goal difference, but leaving Nizhny happy, energised, but still slightly wondering how good they are.

SOURCE: Independent.co.uk

Facebook Comments

You May Also Like

Leave a Reply

SuperWebTricks Loading...
error: Content is protected !!